One of the weakest points in the IMBA approach to trail building in my opinion is their way of building switchbacks, their rolling crown design.
While their design apparently works well, the amount of labor and materials needed to build the massive turning platform makes it likely that once you try it you will work hard to avoid building one again. My question to you trail builders out there: can anyone show me a location in the lower Midwest where someone has actually built a rolling crown switchback? Maybe DeWayne has done one with his Ditch-Witch?
This resource:
http://www.scn.org/sbtp/swbk-defex.htmltook me about a week of casual reading and several email exchanges with the author to make sure I understood what he is trying to say. It's not an easy read, but it lead me to realize that the option that IMBA casually dismisses as a "climbing turn", with subtle modification, is actually the way that professional road builders make switchbacks.
I tried to build a rolling crown switchback on the east side of Over Lode. After putting in about 80 hours (mine + others) of work, and still having nowhere near enough retaining wall or dirt, I ran out of time and just left it partially finished. Then I read (and reread) the link above.
I put a curb log across the middle of the turn to prevent people from shortcutting it. Since the rest of the turn was already a correctly designed (non-rolling crown) switchback, the job was done. The new approach saved me at least another 20 hours of labor, and I'm very happy with the result.
It's difficult to describe a 3-dimensional structure with words, but the difference between what IMBA refers to as a climbing turn, and a properly designed switchback is while a climbing turn simply makes a loop over the surface of the slope, a switchback is cut into the hillside across the trail's top leg, and the spoil is used with a small retaining wall to build up the lower leg of the turn. As a result, in a switchback, the section of the turn that is aligned with the fall line will have a shallower slope than the fall line. If the trail leading into the upper leg of the turn is correctly designed with a grade reversal, the combination of reduced slope and grade reversal make the turn resistant to erosion from water damage and wheel slippage.
Another difficulty with the rolling crown design is the presence of the raised crown in the turn forces the designer to concentrate the elevation change into the trail legs leading in and out of the turn. Because the turn is typically being built on a steep slope, it becomes necessary to carefully plan the trail leading into and out of the turn to accommodate the crown in the middle of the turn. It's easy to get well into building the turn and suddenly discover that the slope of the trail leading out of the turn is unacceptably steep. Time to build a ramp, requiring more fill dirt. To be fair, an experienced builder, unlike myself, would be less likely to have difficulty with this point.
It's fairly easy to imagine that this sort of construction might use more dirt than was mined from cutting the upper leg of the turn. It's also possible that the options for getting the dirt to the work site might entail either running a line of wheel barrows up and down the hillside on the singletrack you just built, or making a borrow pit nearby (I've seen this discussed on MTBR) . Ask William how the property owners at Black Hawk feel about the borrow pits made during the construction of some of the dirt jumps out there.
This isn't to say IMBA is wrong and I have a magic pipeline to the truth. It's just that their labor estimates seem to me to be on the optimistic side, and there is an easier, more effective way to do the job.
Walt